Camera Comparison: Nikon ZR vs Canon C50 vs Sony FX2

Filmmakers today have more choices than ever — from cinema-focused bodies to hybrid all-rounders. These three cameras target slightly different creators, but all aim to help you make high-quality video content.


Overview: What They Are
  • Nikon ZR – Nikon’s new full-frame video-centric camera with professional video specs and RED-influenced RAW workflow at a competitive price.
  • Canon EOS C50 – Canon’s compact cinema camera with 7K open gate, internal RAW, and Canon’s color science.
  • Sony FX2 – A full-frame cinema/hybrid camera positioned for creators needing excellent balance of performance, IBIS, and workflow.

Sensor & Video Capabilities
Resolution & Formats
  • ZR: Up to 6K/60p internal RAW and 4K 120p with professional codecs.
  • C50: Up to 7K video internally without crop and high-speed options.
  • FX2: 4K up to 60p (with crop for higher frame rates).

* Winner for resolution flexibility: C50 > ZR > FX2 (C50 offers the highest raw resolution and creative framing space.)


Stabilization & Autofocus
  • ZR: Built-in 5-axis IBIS, excellent for handheld and run-and-gun shooting.
  • FX2: Also has IBIS and strong AF performance, ideal for solo creators and dynamic shooting.
  • C50: No IBIS, relying on stabilized lenses or gimbals — cinema-style approach.

* Winner for hybrid handheld shooting: ZR & FX2 (both offer built-in stabilization).


Low Light & Dynamic Range
  • ZR: RED-inspired high dynamic range and strong color science, though codec quality and edge detail vary.
  • C50: Excellent Canon color science and wide latitude for grading.
  • FX2: Dual ISO and noise handling help in low light, with generally clean results.

*Low-light edge: FX2 slightly leads for noise handling, followed by ZR and C50.


Screen & Usability
  • ZR: Large 4″ bright screen — great for monitoring outdoors.
  • C50: Standard cinema ergonomic screen, no EVF.
  • FX2: Fully articulated screen and viewfinder, useful in varied shooting conditions.

*Best for monitoring: ZR (screen) and FX2 (screen + EVF).


Workflow & Recording
  • ZR: Supports multiple internal RAW formats (R3D NE, ProRes RAW, N-RAW) and high bit-depth options.
  • C50: Cinema-focused internal RAW and log options, dual-slot recording.
  • FX2: Strong codec support and Sony’s reliable ecosystem integration.

*Best for post flexibility: ZR (RAW options) and C50 (trusted cinema workflow).


Pros & Cons at a Glance
CameraStrengthsWeaknesses
Nikon ZRAffordable RAW video, IBIS, big screenLacks full-size pro ports, ecosystem still growing
Canon C50Highest resolution video, Canon color scienceNo IBIS, heavier
Sony FX2IBIS + EVF, great hybrid usabilityLower top resolution

Who Should Choose Which?

Choose the Nikon ZR if you want:

  • A professional-level RAW video camera at a great price
  • Built-in stabilization and large screen for run-and-gun
  • Multiple internal RAW formats for deep post workflows

Choose the Canon C50 if you want:

  • Maximum resolution (7K Open Gate)
  • Canon’s color science and elegant cinema workflows
  • A dedicated cinema camera for narrative, commercials, indie films

Choose the Sony FX2 if you want:

  • A balanced hybrid camera with great stabilization and autofocus
  • Lightweight, versatile shooting for documentaries, weddings, events

Final Take

There’s no single “best” camera — only the best for your style of filmmaking:

  • Resolution & Cinema look: Canon C50
  • Raw flexibility & value: Nikon ZR
  • Hybrid everyday use: Sony FX2

Each has strengths depending on your workflow, budget, and shooting needs.

– Dark Screen Production

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *